First my apologies, I am crap at computers and websites, but it's the best I can do

Well, breast cancer cured by Bee Sting? and in as little as one hour !, unbelievable? but fact, however by and large shelved whilst scientists strive to find  a pharmaceutical "copy?" that can be patented.

https://perkins.org.au/honeybee-venom-kills-breast-cancer-cells/

Well I think that it is fair enough to try to find a cure, but what isn't fair, is the fact that females are suffering, dying, from this apparent second highest killer of females worldwide, when this proven cure is readily available, welcome to sunny, greedy, apathetic, Australia.

It would be the simplest task to have a qualified Medical Research Team, carrying out the necessary medical procedures to safely treat cancer tumours with Bee Venom either raw or, refined to melittin , for willing patients.

Learning as we go perhaps, but surely that could be a better prospect than the current death rate and negligence.

As its bigger than that, far bigger, you see I trust, Bee Venom has been proven to have cured Prostate and Ovarian cancers, plus Melanoma, as Bee sting has cured these also, obviously it ought to be apparent that a far broader spectrum of cancers and illness's could potentially be assisted, which could be a tremendous financial threat to

 Pharmaceutical companies and therefore their ability to if not "Bribe", but donate to Political Parties, of whom within Australia, whilst they have been aware of the tremendous success rate of cured Cancer Patients, as  a far to high amount of their constituents succumb to and/or are ill with these at times, curable cancers.

And please remember whilst these Patients remain ill or succumb, the whole family is suffering,.
 
At the whim perhaps of the Bureaucrats,  the failing Medical Profession, the greedy and/or negligent Politicians and their financial masters. 

"THERMOGRAPHY " has progressed in leaps and bounds within the last couple of decades and has been claimed to be able to detect cancer "hotspots" as much as four years in front of the traditional Mammary scan used for breast cancer. 

The Politicians have this information at their elbow, have they told you? I very much doubt it. Despite the obvious conclusion that cures can relieve the burden of an over worked, under funded Public Health system.

There are many people, including from the Medical fraternity of whom, don't seem to be either aware, or perhaps wanting to be aware, of these issues.

A local Doctor to Albany, Western Australia with aspiring Political ambitions asked me for details regarding the Bee Venom proven cures, he and his Liberal Party, has declined to correspond since information was made available to him 

Quite apart from some very speedy cures, I understand that with this method, adjacent neighboring cells, flesh or perhaps organs are not impacted upon to the same degree as with chemotherapy, surely that is a great plus to diminish suffering, all to easy, quicker  and cheaper too? 

The Therapeutic Goods Administration ( TGA)  hearsay, I understand was able to assist the quick approval of the claimed anti covid 19 injected drug which made squillions of dollars, they were not vaccinations, I have read, but injected drugs that may have killed or harmed far more than it saved.

Whilst it seems to be the opinion of many that the TGA and/or perhaps some of its staff or decision makers may have some financial association with Pharmaceutical Companies which TGA seems to be largely funded  ( can that be 80% ?) by such companies, surely a conflict of interest fear to some.

Since the highly successful Bee Sting is a natural product and can not be patented anyway, I fail to see that the TGA, would have anything to do with either approving or disapproving its use, much as a "dock leaf", could be rubbed on nettle stings to alleviate  pain, or to wipe your bum on should you be caught short in the woods, don't need no squirmy "back pocket deal,"  Bureaucrats approval there.

Plus there is something called "first Aid, administering a potential lifesaving cure, whether a tourniquet, a poultice, a sticky plaster, splint or CPR is a duty of care.

 Saving lives, basic first aid known to most of us naturally, what's the difference with a natural cure for breast cancer other than profit motives perhaps.?

Surely, freedom of choice is applicable, with a proven cure readily available, obviously an adult female, of sound mind, should be able to opt for a trial Bee sting treatment, whilst she's perhaps otherwise sitting on her bum days, weeks, months awaiting a  chemo treatment course to be made available.

With such a proven record of successful cures, that would seem a strategy worth a try, wouldn't you think?

Further, if you are thinking, cause, have you ever considered in your wildest dreams, that there are hard facts, undeniable facts that, Bureaucracy at least within Western Australia could be linked to such high rates of not only  these current cancers, both past and  for the next three generations at least.

 If you can take that on board, then include Local Government, State and Federal Government as Parties that need to answer questions and that ain't just about their benefactors or ambitions.

There is ample evidence of negligence for decades regarding foodstuffs, carcinogens and high risk, right into the best suburbs of Perth and I am talking about carcinogens that can bioaccumulate from Great Grandmother to Great Grandchildren

"Natural Cancer Remedies Environmental Research Pty Ltd",.  ACN 665256100
Has been created to try to establish a premises, to carry out real research, to promote knowledge, to actually saving lives.

For a far to great number of you reading this information about Bee Venom curing Cancer, it will be the first incidence of such knowledge.

  It is unthinkable that such knowledge is selfishly kept from the Public eye, much more so, to deprive our Women of cures, purely for selfish greed.

There is no  funding for this company to try to reverse this current trend and its been like this for years, decades.

If you could kindly help, Please tell everyone that you can, expose this criminal neglect;
BSB 806015
ACC;  02163156

Every last cent and more, goes to trying to advance, or promote these issues.




(Australian Cotton Growers claim to have lost successive Crops due to others spraying, what's  surprising to me,  is  The Governments claim, being that such "Over" sprays could have travelled 50 Kilometers and still had the toxicity  to destroy literally thousands of acres of crops, regularly. 

DO YOU SEE?              DID YOU fail to  NOTICE???

Government  express concern as to Financial loss, to cotton crops through "spray drift",

 But Absolutely no mention of Risk to Women, Children, stock or Environment, if drinking from tanks fed from contaminated gutters, within such distances.

Most of us just never think of things like this, in the State of Western Australia with by far to high an incidence of Breast Cancer and child leukemia.

Demolition sites are able to disperse previous Termiticides, such as Dieldrin and Chlorpyrifos, which Carcinogens are not only able to be detected in Breast, Colon, Prostate Cancers victims today, but yes of course, Child Leukemia, of which I believe Perth has the highest per capita, within Australia, but sadly, can also transgress multi-generations, Granny to Grandchild.

What a legacy. 

If that is true, why on Earth didn't you know about it?

With W.A. Govt: predicting an about 35% increase in all these Cancers within the next decade.

Possibly their prediction vastly understated, with parts of the "caring" medical fraternity, having created a new medical term of,  "Turbo Cancers", since the hurried anti covid drug shots rollout, qualified Medical professionals have determined immune systems impaired, risk of DNA impact, perhaps or already  leading to higher Cancer risk. 

We seem to be in an era, quite unprecedented in known world history I am not conspiracy theorist, nor anti Vaccination, I think Breast or Prostate Cancer patients should be able to chose a potential cure, injected or not.. That ought to be adult choice, as mammary scans over Thermography.

But a concern is that qualified Australian, American and British  Medical professionals have stated that with the newly claimed "turbo Cancers", youngsters are being discovered with well advanced stages of cancers. Including the very young, if very early teens  have been determined with advanced breast cancers, I would think that the threshold recommended age to commence  mammary scans at West Australian Govt; advice, 

"Generally, it's recommended for women aged 50 to 74 to have a mammogram every two years. For women aged 40 to 49, mammograms can be considered based on personal risk factors",.

Could be vastly negligent.

Foodstuff's, I grew "organic" within the suburbs of Perth, worm farming, natural insecticides, natural composting, yet within hundreds of metres of regular demolition sites, I observed dust accumulation  increases, when nearby residences were demolished, chickens egg shells despite high calcium consumption and care, I noted over a couple of years became fragile, perhaps read up about dieldrin and Chlorpyrifos if you wish to know what that could indicate, or look in at the child leukemia wards.
Bee Venom is said to have been beneficial with leukemia.

Building a show piece "rainbow bridge' over a roadway isn't to the same degree.

West Australian bureaucrats have been aware of foodstuff risks for decades, checkout "Pemberton sheep Dieldrin"   https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/rqmsplant/682/
Sheep can accumulate OC residues. However, results from Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development experiments indicate they reduce levels more rapidly than cattle when removed from the contaminated area. All owners with sheep grazing OC treated land are required to have a Quarantine Management Notice and an agreed property management plan to ensure any product sold does not have levels of residue above the MRL.
The level of OCs in an animal is related to the intake of residues, amount of fat present and the stage of production of the animal, that is, whether it is growing, lactating or losing weight. Residues can also appear in the wool. Fat levels greater than the MRL have been recorded in mature sheep but they can 'rundown' the level of OCs in their bodies quickly once placed on clean grazing land.
The maximum amount of dieldrin allowed in fat before an animal is considered unsuitable for human consumption is 0.2 ppm (or 0.2 mg per kg of fat). The MRL for DDT is 5 mg/kg. The MRL for milk for human consumption is 0.15 ppm for dieldrin and 1.25 ppm for DDT.
The level of any OC in wool has not been set, but currently any level above 3 ppm may result in withdrawal of the wool from sale and/or charges for scouring the wool. This may happen on soils contaminated with either DDT or dieldrin.

 That is basically conjured crap, smoke and mirrors, lactating sheep have dispursed an amount of carcinogens into the lambs both in the womb and further with udder milk.

Exactly as in the case of humans.

Perhaps there is an insinuation that the lambs are born carcinogen free, but please note, no testing of lambs shown, surely a necessity with  bona fidi  research. 

 Anyway, such levels of allowable carcinogenic consumption, at the whim of bureaucrats, many of you had Grandparents that never had any such permissible levels, many of them probably had Zero impact of these common carcinogens. Because they weren't around.

Which  situation in this age of "turbo Cancers" would you prefer for your loved ones?

The effects of dieldrin and chlorpyrifos, are immense, look them up for yourselves, but have you considered behavior change?  How many open gays, may not be so if not exposed to these carcinogens?  which also can cause obesity, how many West Australians may not have weight problems if they or their forebears hadn't been exposed to these widely distributed carcinogens, behavior change? could it cause less judicial interest in young boys?, I think not.

But we can hope, but the scientific evidence was available decades ago, before the West Australian Bureaucracy allowed widespread dissipation.


12/04/25  ON THE "VICTORIAN CANCER COUNCIL" SITE, THEIR LATEST UP TO DATE INFORMATION CLAIMS;

"While no single natural substance definitively kills breast cancer cells, certain foods and compounds have shown promising anti-cancer activity in research. These include curcumin (found in turmeric), dark leafy greens, cruciferous vegetables (like broccoli), and fermented soy products. These foods contain antioxidants and other compounds that can inhibit cancer cell growth and promote apoptosis (programmed cell death)." 

Surely their information is negligent, a claimed authority and they are not alone, similar Cancer authorities ABOUND WITH SIMILAR VIEWS breast cancer is huge money for some. 

How can such authorities not be aware of the tremendous success rates with Bee Venom?

When oher Information supplied by multiple scientists says breast cancer cured in one hour!

Form your own opinions as to why such criminally negligent misinformation is propagated AND TO WHAT OR WHOSE BENEFIT?.

A Medical Journal whereby there may not be any Hope of medical fraternity decimating their earnings to save cancer victim income 

Published. 

Honeybee venom kills breast cancer cells By AMP Editor -09/12/2020
Australian researchers have reported that melittin – the active ingredient in honeybee venom – rapidly killed two types of aggressive breast cancer cells in laboratory studies, while leaving healthy cells unharmed. 

However, their study, reported in the journal npr Precision Oncology, also found venom from bumblebees – which contains no melittin – did not kill the cancer cells, even at high concentrations.

The scientists at Perth’s Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and the University of Western Australia studied the effect of melittin (the molecule responsible for the painful sensation in a bee sting) on ‘triple- negative’ and ‘HER2-enriched’ breast cancers which “tend to develop resistance to existing treatments” and are “associated with the poorest outcomes”, noted medical news today.com.

Lead researcher Dr Ciara Duffy noted: “The venom was extremely potent. We found that melittin can completely destroy cancer cell membranes within 60 minutes.”The study explained how melittin not only “punched holes” in cancer cells’ outer membranes, but within 20 minutes also “disrupted the passing of chemical messages” which cells need to grow and divide. Hence, Dr Duffy added, the cancer signalling pathways – the chemical messages that are fundamental for cancer cell growth and reproduction – were “very quickly shut down”.The team discovered melittin does this by preventing the activation of receptors for growth factors in the cells’ membranes. One of the reasons HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancers grow uncontrollably is they have large numbers of these receptors.

The team also examined whether, because melittin creates holes in cell membranes, it “may also allow existing chemotherapy drugs to penetrate and kill cancer cells”.Using a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer, they found a combination of melittin and the drug docetaxel “proved more effective at shrinking the tumours than either docetaxel or melittin alone” – raising the potential to use this strategy to increase the efficacy or reduce the dosage of chemotherapy drugs (thereby reducing harmful side effects).

The study authors also noted honeybee venom is relatively cheap and easily obtainable globally, making it a good option for cancer treatment in countries with poorly resources health services.Sources: npr Precision Oncology and medicalnewstoday.com

Can they sleep nights?

I have been told that chemotherapy is worse than the illness and wonder after about five years of scientific evaluation, discovering that Bee sting kills tumours without harming adjacent flesh or organs, what the need for chemotherapy really is.

Five years is a lot of females in Western Australia at risk.

To what degree has greed impacted upon societies or humanities ethics?  for this not to be public knowledge and readily available

Personally I have little need for money, but envisage a clinic setting, could be a small farm, allowing the peace of animals, closer to nature, plenty of bee hives,  buildings suitable for research, short stay patients.

Maybe a cottage industry selling honey or bee products, best Coffee/Tea in the State and to spread the word.
 
The world would beat a pathway to the door.

Dream of ambitions, or nightmares of cancers?

Patients free or donate what they can, but fight for Government grants.

There is and would be an anticipated huge opposition to such a cause, from bureaucrats, politicians and the parts of the medical profession.

My vision I could donate a sum if a benefactor needs a tax break. But whether a trust, or the current business name, whatever my ambition is solely to see it happen.

Obviously if the idea has merit, someone/anyone could take it, use it themselves, to make great profits.  But that is not my intent.