Breast, Ovarian, Prostate Melanoma, Cancer proven cures

First my apologies, I am crap at computers and websites, but it's the best I can do, please do better


Well, breast cancer cells cured by Bee Sting? and  cell  membrane piercings in twenty minutes? or as little as one hour !, unbelievable? but fact,  scientists strive to find  a pharmaceutical "copy?" that can be patented.

https://perkins.org.au/honeybee-venom-kills-breast-cancer-cells/

Well I think that it is fair enough to try to find another cure, but what isn't fair, is the fact that females are suffering, dying, from this apparent second highest killer of females worldwide, when this proven cure is readily available for further research to females advantage,  rather than just 
 pharmaceutical companies profits.

Couldn't a qualified Medical Research Team, carrying out the necessary medical procedures to safely treat cancer tumors with Bee Venom either raw or, refined to melittin , for willing patients,  progress humanitarian medical procedures?*

Learning as we go perhaps, but surely that could be a better prospect than the current death rate and negligence.

What I mean in one instance is, should perhaps a prescribing Doctor, with a failing patient, advise the poor soul or her family, "Well Dear the prognosis doesn't look good, I very much  doubt if the industry or myself can milk enough out of you to service my Rolls Royce before you may expire, we have successfully mutilated your body, bombarded good cells with chemotherapy, but the immediate future looks glim,  but Bee  Venom and Turkeytail Mushroom, have shown positive results, perhaps you'd like to try?", 
Obviously cynical, but surely there ought to be an avenue of choice, not at the horrible sad failure end of the journey, but at the beginning.

Since Australian authorities claim that 2024 alone  produced  about 21,000, newly diagnosed breast cancer victims, in Australia surely failing to provide a swift proven cure is a gross negligence, surely dicing with death, yet Australians remain uninformed thus silent.
Multiply with the Worlds effected females, the numbers must be staggering.

As worldwide figures at least 2.3 million newly diagnosed, again for 2024 alone but  Folks, that isn't including undiagnosed, shocking ain't it? Remember that's 2024 alone, without previous already diagnosed, or 2025,s new harvest.

Quoted female deaths for Perth 2024, can be "according" to various authorities ranging wildly, as the Public perception of Perth is Perth general area, but bureaucracy has it divided to smaller units, there are Perth, East Metropolitan,West,  North , South,  country etc,, are these political ploys to a propaganda end result?  If so , why? Is 1,500 ? close to a total state figure per annum?.

Is it any wonder that big pharma donates to Political Parties?.

And possibly able to direct publicly funded learning institutions direction of research and study.

As it seems to me, Monash University and University of Western Australia (UWA), are apparently "State Owned", so looking at the chicken and egg issue, what comes first? my view is The Health Department of Western Australia's neglect and that goes back decades.

But looking at UWA, "progressively "  pursuing the known breast cancer cure by Bee Sting, doesn't seem to be getting much past the test tubes to me in five years of scientific endeavor, observation, or trials, perhaps 6,000 plus West Australian females may have succumbed in that time.

But "State owned" obviously funded at least in part from Rates, Taxes, and in W.A. billions of dollars in Royalties, dolloped out at the whim of bureaucrats, and politicians, the  UWA may also get grants from individuals, industry, perhaps the pharmaceutical Companies, who also apparently donate to the major Political Parties, can we say Labor and Liberal ?  who virtually sing from the same hymn sheet.

So do we get a "round Robin"? 

Especially were it to be the case that our State funded Scientists are pursuing "Patentable copies" of Bee Sting or melittin, when there is obviously a rapidly growing abundance of traumatized females within Australia or Western Australia.

Surely with the rate and Tax payers percentage of interest, cures rather than prolonged illness's bolstering up pharmaceutical  profits, the  public ought to be able to scrutinize exactly, or at least have a say in how scientific directions are pursued to a common good, independent to Pharmaceutical interests and for humanitarian ideals, a dream, as the pollie's and Bureaucrats have the population as blinded as a rabbit in your headlights 

About the world, scientific investigation states; " the results of previously conducted in-vitro and in-vivo research. As described later, bee venom has given positive results in triggering apoptosis, preventing cell migration, inhibiting metastasis and invasion, and suppressing the existing breast cancer cells. It is found to have worked better along with the already existing chemotherapy treatments". 

As to suggested pairing Bee Venom with chemotherapy,  Personally I wonder if such worldwide research opinions , indicate a connection to pharmaceutical funding, as if Bee venom can achieve positive results without impact upon neighboring cells, could any "advantage"  effect caused by chemotherapy, be  countered when long term claims as to chemotherapy use are considered?, perhaps conditions vary greatly with differing patients, or profits. 

It baffles me that Australian Politicians.are able to create an Act or Bill, that Pharmaceutical Companies are exempt from prosecution, regarding potentially dangerous and under trialed drugs, without politicians declaring their Political  or financial interest, with such Pharmaceutical Companies donating to their Political Parties, surely their votes ought to be null and void.

But ought not the State of Western Australia, commence clinical trials with an entirely  separate team of scientists, trialing the natural Bee Sting or its contents into  willing adults, who may choose that prospect over chemotherapy, or possibly imminent death?

How can they decline to do so and claim to be scientific?

It wouldn't surprise me in the least, if some of our scientists currently working on such procedures, would quit present positions and work for less remuneration, should such an opportunity arise, since my opinion is, aspiring good intent decent folk, could possibly be frustrated with any pressure from "above" or anywhere else, interfering with their spiritual or integrity standards.  But its job or no job now perhaps, frustrating as it may be for some.

Premier Cook was Health Minister for much of these last years, is still bleating on about flu vaccinations, hasn't Cook heard of the human bodies wonderful capacity to develop natural immunity?, after all surely the clown must realize his lies as Health Minister, regarding anti Covid Vaccinations "saving " you from covid, saving Grannie, via her vaccinations then asking  the kids to get vaccinated to save Granny, because Grannie wasn't safe or protected. Social distancing working, sneezing into your sleeve, for heavens sake, what  a tosser? , touching elbows instead of a real Aussie handshake?.

If the Government can't deal with the growing amount of those impacted upon, why cannot some of those vast State of Western Australian Royalties be diverted to actually trying to save these females and thence taking a lot of pressure off an under paid, under staffed and under funded health system?

Surely W.A. has a wealth of decent folk who would gladly contribute part of their time to staffing a clinic, trying to genuinely save Breast Cancer victims and not only stopping needless suffering in W.A. but possibly resonating around the world,

Perhaps Ladies who have been treated successfully, coming in to help, as gratitude to their being cured, wouldn't that be a positive?  not everyone is transfixed with money.

 
As its bigger than that, far bigger, you see I trust, Bee Venom has been proven to have cured Prostate and Ovarian cancer cells, plus Melanoma, as Bee sting has cured these also,

 obviously

 it ought to be apparent that a far broader spectrum of cancers and illness's could potentially be assisted, which could be a tremendous financial threat to

 Pharmaceutical companies and therefore their ability to if not "Bribe", but donate to Political Parties, of whom within Australia, whilst they have been aware of the potential tremendous success rate of cured Cancer Patients, possibly at the same time, as a  far to high amount of their own constituents succumb to and/or are ill with these possible, at times, curable cancers.

Around the world the far greater range of cancers claimed to be successfully impacted adversely by Bee venom includes leukemia, a bit of a passion with myself due to knowledge of its causes and the drastic amount of such in Western Australian children.

And please remember whilst these Patients remain ill or succumb, the whole family is suffering,.
 
At the whim perhaps of the Bureaucrats,  the failing Medical Profession, the greedy and/or negligent Politicians and their financial masters. 

What I mean is, scientific research, is deficient should it solely follow ambitions to create pharmaceutical patentable copies, shouldn't there  be scientific evaluation of cures from the if not God given, but Mother Nature provided assets?

Working to a common good, rather than wealth?

"THERMOGRAPHY " has progressed in leaps and bounds within the last couple of decades and has been claimed to be able to detect cancer "hotspots" as much as four years in front of the traditional Mammary scan used for breast cancer. 

The Politicians have this information at their elbow, have they told you? I very much doubt it. 

Despite the obvious conclusion that cures can relieve the burden of an as stated over worked, under funded Public Health system.

There are many people, including from the Medical fraternity of whom, don't seem to be either aware, or perhaps wanting to be aware, of these issues.

But just what are the possibilities if thermography detecting earlier, coupled with Bee Venom, hitting the tumours in its infancy were to be adopted?

Surely that could be a better option than developing a "cure" that leaves survivors dependent upon medication for life?

Is it possible or probable that proper research into the Bee sting phenomenon,  could expose that far broader spectrum of cancer cures,  that I expect?

 Or the pharmaceutical industry dreads? and/or possibly knows of, but don't wish the public to become aware.

A local Doctor to Albany, Western Australia with aspiring Political ambitions asked me for details regarding the Bee Venom proven cures, he and his Liberal Party, has declined to correspond since information was made available to him 

Quite apart from some very speedy cancer cell impact, I understand that with this method, adjacent neighboring cells, flesh or perhaps organs would not be impacted upon to the same degree as with chemotherapy, surely that is a great plus to diminish suffering, is this  easier, quicker  and cheaper too? 

The Therapeutic Goods Administration ( TGA)  hearsay, I understand was able to assist the quick approval of the claimed anti covid 19 injected drug which made squillions of dollars, they were not vaccinations, I have read, but injected drugs that may have killed or harmed far more than it saved.

Whilst it seems to be the opinion of many that the TGA and/or perhaps some of its staff or decision makers may have some financial association with Pharmaceutical Companies which TGA seems to be largely funded  ( can that be by as much as  80% ?) by such companies, surely a conflict of interest fear to some.

Since the highly successful Bee Sting is a natural product and can not be patented anyway, I fail to see that the TGA, would have anything to do with either approving or disapproving its use,.

Plus there is something called "first Aid, administering a potential lifesaving cure, whether a tourniquet, a poultice, a sticky plaster, splint or CPR is an obligation of care.

 Saving lives, basic first aid known to most of us, what's the difference with a natural cure for breast cancer other than profit motives perhaps.?

Surely, freedom of choice is applicable, with a potential proven cure readily available, obviously an adult female, of sound mind, should be able to opt for a trial Bee sting treatment, whilst she's perhaps otherwise sitting on her bum days, weeks, months awaiting a  chemo treatment course to be made available.

With such a possibility of successful cures, that would seem a strategy worth a try, wouldn't you think?

Further, if you are thinking, cause, have you ever considered in your wildest dreams, that there are hard facts, undeniable facts that, Bureaucracy at least within Western Australia could be linked to such high rates of not only  these current cancers, both past and  for the next three generations at least.

 If you can take that on board, then include Local Government, State and Federal Government as Parties that need to answer questions and that ain't just about their benefactors or ambitions.

There is ample evidence of negligence for decades regarding foodstuffs, carcinogens and high risk, right into the best suburbs of Perth and I am talking about carcinogens that can bioaccumulate from Great Grandmother to Great Grandchildren


For a far to great number of you reading this information about Bee Venom curing Cancer, it will be the first incidence of such knowledge.

  It is unthinkable that such knowledge is selfishly kept from the Public eye, much more so, to deprive our Women of cures, purely for selfish greed.

There is no  funding for this company to try to reverse this current trend and its been like this for years, decades.

If you could kindly help, Please tell everyone that you can, expose this criminal neglect;
BSB 806015
ACC;  02163156

Every last cent and more, goes to trying to advance, or promote these issues.

Previously I donated thousands from myself and others to a "Breast Cancer Charity", one day dropping some cash off, I asked what they were doing to prevent breast cancer, nothing they replied, we do "after care",. Well that's like putting the cart  before the horse. looking around the office and the cars outside, I ceased going there.
On another occasion, I enrolled to do the "Perth Breast Cancer Run", took information that Bee Sting has cured Breast Cancer, they told me to leave as I was embarrassing them, further if I did not leave, they would call the Perth Ranger and evict me, Breast Cancer is big money,. 

Some things strike me as funny, some Aussies in particular, like to find fault, or detract from perhaps, any positives, for instance many whilst expressing interest conclude, well what about Bee Venom allergies?

And I love them for it, as simply,  if your Mum,  Gran or Grandparents are allergic to bee sting but suffering from a potentially curable cancer.

Couldn't intelligent medical research possibly determine a lesser amount of bee venom that wouldn't impact upon them too much, of course maybe not piercing tumours within twenty minute an hour or so, taking an obvious extended time, but a cure.

Don't look at pharmaceutical walls, look at going over, around, under, or kick the walls down, but save the population that is being neglected today.

Another caring thought people mention is the Bees dying, I think Dr Caitlin Duffy mentioned euthanasia maybe 30,000 unfortunate Bees ?🐝 ?

Well I think Dr Duffy maybe Irish, so we can forgive her for that. I'm an Aussie Pom, so I do, and Dr Duffy can, harvest bee sting without killing many bees.

One device I use is a plate of glass, with electrical wires stretched over it, the wires conduct a minimal charge, which agitates the Bee into stinging the glass plate, other Bees detecting their co workers agitation or perhaps perceived threat to their hives, similarly may sting the glass, but since the glass is not penetrated, the vast majority survive and go about their duties.

The glass plate is removed and the dry venom harvested, a very few Bees may sting each other, but a far better I believe method than block euthanasia coupled with the then task of harvesting the melittin from dead bees, as my way, the same bees can be harvested again later.

We all have differing opinions, people go to the Perth Breast cancer run to "support" the cause, interest whatever, chuck in $50 or so, then swan off to their hairdresser, nail varnish shop, or coffee shop to say they've done their bit and good on em.

Turkeytail mushroom has world recognition about helping with Cancers, grows naturally within Western Australia, did you know? How much research of our natural resources are we missing out on?



Australian Cotton Growers claim to have lost successive Crops due to others spraying, what's  surprising to me,  is  The Governments claim, being that such "Over" sprays could have travelled 50 Kilometers and still had the toxicity  to destroy literally thousands of acres of crops, regularly. 

DO YOU SEE?              DID YOU fail to  NOTICE???

Government  express concern as to Financial loss, to cotton crops through "spray drift",

 But Absolutely no mention of Risk to Women, Children, stock or Environment, if drinking from tanks fed from contaminated gutters, within such distances.

Most of us just never think of things like this, in the State of Western Australia with by far to high an incidence of Breast Cancer and child leukemia.

Demolition sites are able to disperse previous Termiticides, such as Dieldrin and Chlorpyrifos, which Carcinogens are not only able to be detected in Breast, Colon, Prostate Cancers victims today, but yes of course, Child Leukemia, of which I believe Perth has the highest per capita, within Australia, but sadly, can also transgress multi-generations, Granny to Grandchild.

What a legacy. 

If that is true, why on Earth didn't you know about it?

With the W.A. Govt: predicting an about 35% increase in all these Cancers within the next decade.

Possibly their prediction vastly understated, with parts of the "caring" medical fraternity, having created a new medical term of,  "Turbo Cancers", since the hurried anti covid drug shots rollout, qualified Medical professionals have determined immune systems impaired, risk of DNA impact, perhaps or already  leading to higher Cancer risk. 

We seem to be in an era, quite unprecedented in known world history I am not conspiracy theorist, nor anti Vaccination, I think Breast or Prostate Cancer patients should be able to chose a potential cure, injected or not.. That ought to be adult choice, as to Thermography instead of  mammary scans.

But a further concern is that qualified Australian, American and British  Medical professionals have stated that with the newly claimed "turbo Cancers", youngsters are being discovered with well advanced stages of cancers. Including the very young, very early teens ( thirteen and 15 year) have been determined with advanced breast cancers, I would think that the threshold recommended age to commence  mammary scans as per  West Australian Govt; advice, 

"Generally, it's recommended for women aged 50 to 74 to have a mammogram every two years. For women aged 40 to 49, mammograms can be considered based on personal risk factors",.

Could be vastly negligent.

Foodstuff's, I grew "organic" within the suburbs of Perth, worm farming, natural insecticides, natural composting, yet within hundreds of metres of regular demolition sites, I observed dust accumulation  increases, when nearby residences were demolished, chickens egg shells despite high calcium consumption and care, I noted over a couple of years became fragile, perhaps read up about dieldrin and Chlorpyrifos if you wish to know what that could indicate, or look in at the child leukemia wards.
Bee Venom is said to have been beneficial with leukemia.

Building a show piece "rainbow bridge' over a roadway from a child leukaemia hospital to a park, isn't to the same degree.

West Australian bureaucrats have been aware of foodstuff risks for decades, checkout "Pemberton sheep Dieldrin"   https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/rqmsplant/682/
Sheep can accumulate OC residues. However, results from Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development experiments indicate they reduce levels more rapidly than cattle when removed from the contaminated area. All owners with sheep grazing OC treated land are required to have a Quarantine Management Notice and an agreed property management plan to ensure any product sold does not have levels of residue above the MRL.
The level of OCs in an animal is related to the intake of residues, amount of fat present and the stage of production of the animal, that is, whether it is growing, lactating or losing weight. Residues can also appear in the wool. Fat levels greater than the MRL have been recorded in mature sheep but they can 'rundown' the level of OCs in their bodies quickly once placed on clean grazing land.
The maximum amount of dieldrin allowed in fat before an animal is considered unsuitable for human consumption is 0.2 ppm (or 0.2 mg per kg of fat). The MRL for DDT is 5 mg/kg. The MRL for milk for human consumption is 0.15 ppm for dieldrin and 1.25 ppm for DDT.
The level of any OC in wool has not been set, but currently any level above 3 ppm may result in withdrawal of the wool from sale and/or charges for scouring the wool. This may happen on soils contaminated with either DDT or dieldrin.

 That is basically conjured crap, smoke and mirrors, lactating sheep have dispersed an amount of carcinogens into the lambs both in the womb and further with udder milk.

Exactly as in the case of humans.

Perhaps there is an insinuation that the lambs are born carcinogen free, but please note, no testing of lambs shown, surely a necessity with  bona fidi  research. 

Wethers, ( Male castrated meat sheep) are unlikely to lose much carcinogen level other than by their fleeces, which by the way, may have been a major contributing cause of W.A.,s "wool glut",.

Or compare with Western  Australia's or indeed Australia's, current exorbitant level of child leukemia.

Wouldn't bona fide research recommend that all such contaminated farms/properties are tested and caveats or memorials put upon the certificate of titles, to advise owners of Risk?

The USA, apparently caught carcinogen contaminated australian beef, which was kept quiet, ( there is much more to this) but I wonder if the current wish to ban live sheep exports is connected to the few contaminated farms, which may be very potent, rather than our greater amount, of clean sheep suppliers.

Imagine if Muslim countries importing live stock detected contaminated sheep, which certainly ain't hallal, as Allah made them.

Why the negligence?

 Anyway, such levels of allowable carcinogenic consumption, at the whim of bureaucrats, many of you had Grandparents that never had any such permissible levels, many of them probably had Zero impact from these common carcinogens. Because they weren't around.

If you believe the government propaganda, shouldn't they simply empty the breast cancer wards, to graze patients on such clean pastures?, it's ludicrous and inaccurate.

Which  situation in this age of "turbo Cancers" would you prefer for your loved ones?

The effects of dieldrin and chlorpyrifos, are immense, look them up for yourselves, but have you considered behavior change?  How many open gays, may not be so if not exposed to these carcinogens?  which also can cause obesity, how many West Australians may not have weight problems if they or their forebears hadn't been exposed to these widely distributed carcinogens.?

But we can hope, but the scientific evidence was available decades ago, before the West Australian Bureaucracy allowed widespread dissipation.


12/04/25  ON THE "VICTORIAN CANCER COUNCIL" SITE, THEIR LATEST UP TO DATE INFORMATION CLAIMS;

"While no single natural substance definitively kills breast cancer cells, certain foods and compounds have shown promising anti-cancer activity in research. These include curcumin (found in turmeric), dark leafy greens, cruciferous vegetables (like broccoli), and fermented soy products. These foods contain antioxidants and other compounds that can inhibit cancer cell growth and promote apoptosis (programmed cell death)." 

Surely their information is negligent, a claimed authority and they are not alone, similar Cancer authorities ABOUND WITH SIMILAR VIEWS breast cancer is huge money for some. 

How can such authorities not be aware of the tremendous success rates with Bee Venom? AND FIVE YEARS PAST?

When oher Information supplied by multiple scientists says breast cancer virtually cured in one hour!

Form your own opinions as to why such criminally negligent misinformation is propagated AND TO WHAT OR WHOSE BENEFIT?.

A Medical Journal

Published. 

Honeybee venom kills breast cancer cells By AMP Editor -09/12/2020
Australian researchers have reported that melittin – the active ingredient in honeybee venom – rapidly killed two types of aggressive breast cancer cells in laboratory studies, while leaving healthy cells unharmed. 

However, their study, reported in the journal,  Precision Oncology, also found venom from bumblebees – which contains no melittin – did not kill the cancer cells, even at high concentrations.

The scientists at Perth’s Harry Perkins Institute of Medical Research and the University of Western Australia studied the effect of melittin (the molecule responsible for the painful sensation in a bee sting) on ‘triple- negative’ and ‘HER2-enriched’ breast cancers which “tend to develop resistance to existing treatments” and are “associated with the poorest outcomes”, noted medical news today.com.

Lead researcher Dr Ciara Duffy noted: “The venom was extremely potent. We found that melittin can completely destroy cancer cell membranes within 60 minutes.”The study explained how melittin not only “punched holes” in cancer cells’ outer membranes, but within 20 minutes also “disrupted the passing of chemical messages” which cells need to grow and divide. Hence, Dr Duffy added, the cancer signalling pathways – the chemical messages that are fundamental for cancer cell growth and reproduction – were “very quickly shut down”.The team discovered melittin does this by preventing the activation of receptors for growth factors in the cells’ membranes. One of the reasons HER2-enriched and triple-negative breast cancers grow uncontrollably is they have large numbers of these receptors.

The team also examined whether, because melittin creates holes in cell membranes, it “may also allow existing chemotherapy drugs to penetrate and kill cancer cells”.Using a mouse model of triple-negative breast cancer, they found a combination of melittin and the drug docetaxel “proved more effective at shrinking the tumours than either docetaxel or melittin alone” – raising the potential to use this strategy to increase the efficacy or reduce the dosage of chemotherapy drugs (thereby reducing harmful side effects).

The study authors also noted honeybee venom is relatively cheap and easily obtainable globally, making it a good option for cancer treatment in countries with poorly resources health services.Sources: npr Precision Oncology and medicalnewstoday.com

Can they sleep nights, with the years since proving the cures, of denying women folk worldwide the opportunity to try it?

I have been told that chemotherapy is worse than the illness and wonder after about five years of scientific evaluation, discovering that Bee sting kills tumours without harming adjacent flesh or organs, what the need for chemotherapy really is.

Five years is a lot of females in Western Australia at risk.

To what degree has greed impacted upon societies or humanities ethics?  for this not to be public knowledge and readily available

Personally I have little need for money, but envisage a clinic setting, could be a small farm, allowing the peace of animals, closer to nature, plenty of bee hives,  buildings suitable for research, short stay patients.

Maybe a cottage industry selling honey or bee products, best Coffee/Tea in the State and to spread the word.
 
The world would beat a pathway to the door.

Dream of ambitions, or nightmares of cancers?

Patients entirely free or donate what they can, but fight for Government grants, as surely, as an humane society, we should recognize that a decent loving caring third world Mother of a decent family, should have equal rights to life as any  rich person living on Wall St..

There is and would be an anticipated huge opposition to such a cause, from bureaucrats, politicians and the parts of the medical profession.

My vision I could donate a sum if a benefactor needs a tax break. But whether a trust, or the current business name, whatever, my ambition is solely to see it happen.

Obviously if the idea has merit, someone/anyone could take it, use it themselves, to make great profits.  But that is not my intent.

Keep Well Folks.